Incidence of Bacteremia, Infective Endocarditis, or Prosthetic Joint Infection in Dermatologic Surgery: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Prophylactic antibiotic therapy is widely used in dermatologic surgery to prevent surgical site infections and bacteremia, which can lead to prosthetic joint infections (PJI) and infective endocarditis (IE) in high-risk populations. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the incidence of bacteremia, PJI, and IE after dermatologic surgery and assess the current evidence for antibiotic prophylaxis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A search of the computerized bibliographic databases was performed using key terms from the date of inception to March 21, 2021. Data extraction was performed independently by 2 data extractors. RESULTS: The review resulted in 9 publications that met inclusion criteria, including 5 prospective cohort studies and 4 case reports or case series. The prospective studies reported a wide range of bacteremia incidence (0%-7%) after dermatologic surgery. No cases of PJI resulting directly from cutaneous surgery were identified, and only 1 case series reported IE after various skin procedures. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest a low rate of bacteremia and a lack of direct evidence linking dermatologic surgery to PJI or IE. The scarcity of published data on this topic is a limitation, highlighting the need for further research, particularly randomized controlled trials, to guide antibiotic prophylaxis recommendations.

Infective Endocarditis in Patients Addicted to Injected Opioid Drugs.

BACKGROUND: Persons who inject drugs and require surgery for infective endocarditis have 2 potentially lethal diseases. Current postoperative rehabilitation efforts seem ineffective in preventing loss to follow-up, injection drug use relapse (relapse), and death. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to characterize drug use, psychosocial issues, surgical outcome, and postoperative addiction management, as well as loss to follow-up, relapse, and mortality and their risk factors. METHODS: From January 2010 to June 2020, 227 persons who inject drugs, age 36 ± 9.9 years, underwent surgery for infective endocarditis at a quaternary hospital having special interest in developing addiction management programs. Postsurgery loss to follow-up, relapse, and death were assessed as competing risks and risk factors identified parametrically and by machine learning. CIs are 68% (±1 SE). RESULTS: Heroin was the most self-reported drug injected (n = 183 [81%]). Psychosocial issues included homelessness (n = 56 [25%]), justice system involvement (n = 150 [66%]), depression (n = 118 [52%]), anxiety (n = 104 [46%]), and post-traumatic stress disorder (n = 33 [15%]). Four (1.8%) died in-hospital. Medication for opioid use disorder prescribed at discharge increased from 0% in 2010 to 100% in 2020. At 1 and 5 years, conditional probabilities of loss to follow-up were 16% (68% CI: 13%-22%) and 59% (68% CI: 44%-65%), relapse 32% (68% CI: 28%-34%) and 79% (68% CI: 74%-83%), and mortality 21% (68% CI: 18%-23%) and 68% (68% CI: 62%-72%). Younger age, heroin use, and lower education level were predictors of relapse. CONCLUSIONS: Infective endocarditis surgery can be performed with low mortality in persons who inject drugs, but addiction is far more lethal. Risk of loss to follow-up and relapse require more effective addiction strategies without which this major loss to society will continue.

Infective endocarditis after isolated aortic valve replacement: comparison between catheter-interventional and surgical valve replacement.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE) is the prognostically most unfavourable complication after aortic valve replacement. This study aims to contribute to a better understanding of the different pathological and therapeutical aspects between PVE following surgical (SAVR) and transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVI). METHODS: All patients who had undergone primary isolated SAVR (n = 3447) or TAVI (n = 2269) at our Centre between 01/2012 and 12/2018 were analysed. Diagnosis of PVE was based on Duke criteria modified in 2015. Incidence, risk factors, pathogens, impact of complications or therapy on mortality were analysed and compared between SAVR- and TAVI-PVE. RESULTS: PVE incidence did not differ significantly after SAVR with 4.9/100 patient-years and TAVI with 2.4/100 patient-years (p = 0.49), although TAVI patients were older (mean 80 vs. 67 years) and had more comorbidities (STS score mean 5.9 vs. 1.6) (p < 0.001). TAVI prostheses with polymer showed a 4.3-fold higher risk to develop PVE than without polymer (HR 4.3; p = 0.004). Most common pathogens were staphylococci and enterococci (p > 0.05). Propensity-score matching analysis showed that the type of aortic valve replacement had no effect on the development of post-procedural PVE (p = 0.997). One-year survival was higher in TAVI-PVE patients treated with antibiotics only compared to additional surgical therapy (90.9% vs. 33.3%; p = 0.005). In SAVR-PVE patients, both therapies were comparable in terms of survival (p = 0.861). However, SAVR-PVE patients who were not operated, despite ESC-guideline recommendation, had significantly poorer one-year survival (p = 0.004). CONCLUSION: TAVI patients did not have a significantly higher risk to develop PVE. Our data suggest that TAVI-PVE patients in contrast to SAVR-PVE patients can more often be treated with antibiotics only, presumably due to the lack of a polymeric suture ring.

Infective Endocarditis After Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement.

BACKGROUND: Scarce data are available comparing infective endocarditis (IE) following surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) and transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). This study aimed to compare the clinical presentation, microbiological profile, management, and outcomes of IE after SAVR versus TAVR. METHODS: Data were collected from the "Infectious Endocarditis after TAVR International" (enrollment from 2005 to 2020) and the "International Collaboration on Endocarditis" (enrollment from 2000 to 2012) registries. Only patients with an IE affecting the aortic valve prosthesis were included. A 1:1 paired matching approach was used to compare patients with TAVR and SAVR. RESULTS: A total of 1688 patients were included. Of them, 602 (35.7%) had a surgical bioprosthesis (SB), 666 (39.5%) a mechanical prosthesis, 70 (4.2%) a homograft, and 350 (20.7%) a transcatheter heart valve. In the SAVR versus TAVR matched population, the rate of new moderate or severe aortic regurgitation was higher in the SB group (43.4% vs 13.5%; P < .001), and fewer vegetations were diagnosed in the SB group (62.5% vs 82%; P < .001). Patients with an SB had a higher rate of perivalvular extension (47.9% vs 27%; P < .001) and Staphylococcus aureus was less common in this group (13.4% vs 22%; P = .033). Despite a higher rate of surgery in patients with SB (44.4% vs 27.3%; P < .001), 1-year mortality was similar (SB: 46.5%; TAVR: 44.8%; log-rank P = .697). CONCLUSIONS: Clinical presentation, type of causative microorganism, and treatment differed between patients with an IE located on SB compared with TAVR. Despite these differences, both groups exhibited high and similar mortality at 1-year follow-up.

Features of infective endocarditis in a contemporary cohort of persons who inject drugs: a matched comparison analysis of long-term prognostic factors.

The objective of the study was to assess the short- and long-term mortality of infective endocarditis (IE) among people who inject drugs (PWID). Using prospectively collected data on hospitalized patients (years 2000 through 2021) with IE, PWID were identified and included in this study. Survival analysis was performed to analyze short- and long-term mortality and study their risk factors among PWID and a matched group of non-intravenous drug users (N-IDU). In a study of 485 patients admitted for IE, 55 (11%) of them were PWID. These PWID patients were 1:1 age- and sex- matched to an N-IDU group (N = 55 per group). Both groups had similar baseline comorbid conditions, including congestive heart failure, type 2 diabetes, and neoplastic diseases. However, PWID were more likely to have HCV co-infection (62% vs 16%, respectively, p < 0.001) and advanced liver disease/cirrhosis (52% vs 7.9%, respectively, p < 0.001). IE in PWID more often affected the tricuspid valve (42% vs 22%, respectively, p = 0.024) and presented with more embolic events (66% vs 35%, respectively, p < 0.01). S. aureus was the primary cause of IE in PWID (44% vs 21%, respectively, p = 0.01). After adjusting for other variables, PWID (HR = 2.99, 95% CI [1.06, 8.43], p = 0.038) and valve bioprosthetic replacement (HR = 5.37, 95% CI [1.3, 22.1], p = 0.02) were independently associated with increased mortality risk, whereas IE caused by tricuspid valve infection was associated with reduced mortality risk (HR = 0.25, 95% CI [0.06, 0.97], p = 0.046). In this cohort, PWID had increased risk of long-term mortality after hospital discharge for IE, when compared to matched N-IDU with similar baseline characteristics. The reasons behind the significant increase in mortality warrant further investigation.

Root-commando operation with a modified self-assembled aortic root conduit for endocarditis after sutureless aortic valve replacement.

We present a case of a Staphylococcus epidermidis early prosthetic valve endocarditis after minimally invasive sutureless aortic valve replacement. The patient developed a root abscess with a fistula, severe mitral and periprosthetic regurgitations, with a large mitral vegetation and a residual patent foramen ovale. The surgical approach consisted of a redo median sternotomy, explantation of a sutureless aortic prosthesis, resection of an intervalvular fibrosa and anterior mitral leaflet and debridement of an aortic root-left ventricle outflow tract abscess. These procedures were followed by a root-commando procedure with mitral and aortic root placement using a self-assembled mechanical aortic root conduit. The technique used is an alternative to a root-commando procedure performed with an allograft or a Medtronic Freestyle bioprosthesis. The same technique can be utilized with a commercially available stented bioprosthesis.

Scoping review of percutaneous mechanical aspiration for valvular and cardiac implantable electronic device infective endocarditis.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous mechanical aspiration (PMA) of intravascular vegetations is a novel strategy for management of patients with infective endocarditis (IE) who are at high risk of poor outcomes with conventional cardiac surgery. However, clear indications for its use as well as patient outcomes are largely unknown. OBJECTIVES: To conduct a scoping review of the literature to summarize patient characteristics and outcomes of those undergoing PMA for management of IE. METHODS: Two independent reviewers screened abstracts and full text for inclusion and independently extracted data. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Studies published until February 21, 2023, describing the use of PMA for management of patients with cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) or valvular IE were included. ASSESSMENT OF RISK OF BIAS: As this was a scoping review, risk of bias assessment was not performed. METHODS OF DATA SYNTHESIS: Descriptive data was reported. RESULTS: We identified 2252 titles, of which 1442 abstracts were screened, and 125 full text articles were reviewed for inclusion. Fifty-one studies, describing a total of 294 patients who underwent PMA for IE were included in our review. Over 50% (152/294) of patients underwent PMA to debulk cardiac implantable electronic device lead vegetations prior to extraction (152/294), and 38.8% (114/294) of patients had a history of drug use. Patient outcomes were inconsistently reported, but few had procedural complications, and all-cause in-hospital mortality was 6.5% (19/294). CONCLUSIONS: While PMA is a promising advance in the care of patients with IE, higher quality data regarding patient outcomes are needed to better inform the use of this procedure.

Recurrent Bioprosthetic Valve Serratia marcescens Endocarditis in Intravenous Drug Users.

BACKGROUND We report 2 cases of recurrent right-sided endocarditis in 2 young patients known to be intravenous (i.v.) drug users. We highlight the importance of early diagnosis and management, especially in recurrent infection, which has a higher mortality rate and poor prognostic outcome despite antibiotic treatment. CASE REPORT A 30-year-old woman with a medical history of active i.v. drug use and tricuspid valve replacement owing to Serratia marcescens endocarditis 2 months prior to presentation was admitted to the Intensive Care Unit for septic shock. The patient did not respond to i.v. fluids and required vasopressors. Blood cultures returned positive for S. marcescens again. The antibiotic regimen consisted of meropenem and vancomycin. The patient underwent redo sternotomy, explant of old tricuspid valve bioprosthesis, debridement of tricuspid valve annulus, and bioprosthetic valve replacement. She continued antibiotic treatment during hospital admission for 6 weeks. In another similar case, a 30-year-old woman, also an i.v. drug user, was admitted to the hospital for tricuspid bioprosthetic valve S. marcescens endocarditis after tricuspid valve replacement 5 months prior to her presentation with S. marcescens endocarditis. Her antibiotic regimen consisted of meropenem and vancomycin. She was eventually transferred to a tertiary cardiovascular surgery center for further case management. CONCLUSIONS In the setting of recurrent bioprosthetic valve S. marcescens endocarditis, it is suggested that treatment should be more focused on source control, including cessation of i.v. drug abuse and providing appropriate antibiotic treatment to prevent recurrence because, in the case of recurrence, morbidity and mortality risk can increase significantly.

Infective endocarditis after transcatheter edge-to-edge repair for severe mitral regurgitation; a case report and a systematic review.

Transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) is used extensively in patients with symptomatic severe mitral regurgitation and high surgical risk. While prosthetic valve endocarditis is well documented, infective endocarditis (IE) after TEER is a rare occurrence. To date, no study has been conducted on this complication. We report the case of an 85-year-old man who developed IE 3 months after undergoing TEER, and we systematically review 26 previously published cases of this complication. Our review findings indicate that discussion within the heart team is essential for the decision-making process and treatment strategy determination.

Risk factors for infective endocarditis in patients receiving hemodialysis: A propensity score matched cohort study.

In patients receiving hemodialysis, infective endocarditis (IE) may present in a similar way to other causes of bacteremia, which may delay early diagnosis and can lead to worse outcomes. In this study, we aimed to identify the risk factors for IE in hemodialysis patients with bacteremia. This study was conducted on all patients diagnosed with IE and receiving hemodialysis between 2005 and 2018 in Salford Royal Hospital. Patients with IE were propensity score matched with similar hemodialysis patients with episodes of bacteremia between 2011 and 2015 (non-IE bacteremic (NIEB)). Logistic regression analysis was used to predict the risk factors associated with infective endocarditis. There were 35 cases of IE, and these were propensity matched with 70 NIEB cases. The median age of the patients was 65 years with a predominance of males (60%). The IE group had higher peak C-reactive protein compared to the NIEB group (median, 253 mg/L vs. 152, p = 0.001). Patients with IE had a longer duration of prior dialysis catheter use than NIEB patients (150 vs. 28.5 days: p = 0.004). IE patients had a much higher 30-day mortality rate (37.1% vs. 17.1%, p = 0.023). Logistic regression analysis showed previous valvular heart disease (OR: 29.7; p < 0.001), and a higher baseline C-reactive protein (OR: 1.01; p = 0.001) as significant predictors for infective endocarditis. Bacteremia in patients receiving hemodialysis through a catheter access should be actively investigated with a high index of suspicion for infective endocarditis, particularly in those with known valvular heart disease and a higher baseline C-reactive protein.

Infective endocarditis and oral surgery input before cardiac surgery: time to prick the paradigm of pre-cardiac surgery assessments?

Purpose To review current practice regarding oral surgery input for patients awaiting cardiac valvular surgery and who are at risk of infective endocarditis (IE) in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, and to stimulate debate around the indications for pre-operative oral surgery assessment. It also opens the way to developing a new research-based approach which is patient-centred, safe, effective and efficient.Methods A desk-top based patient review was undertaken between 27 March 2020 and 1 July 2022 to record the outcome of patients undergoing cardiac valvular surgery in Northern Ireland, following the revision of the referral guidelines for oral surgery intervention. Data were collected for all cardiac referrals to the oral surgery on-call service in the Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast. Complications were recorded at two weeks, two months, and six months post-surgery, using Northern Ireland Electronic Care Records.Results In total, 67 cardiac patients were identified between 27 March 2020 and 1 July 2022: 65.7% of patients were male and had an average age of 68, while the female patients had an average age of 61. The mean interval of date of cardiology referral to surgery date was 9.7 working days, with 36% of patients referred within five days of the planned surgery date. Moreover, 39% had valvular surgery in combination with another type of cardiac surgery. No complications linked to dental aetiology were noted.Conclusions This paper raises questions about the advisability of oral surgery input before cardiac surgery for anything other than pain relief, management of acute dental sepsis, or IE whose source has been identified as an oral commensal. The COVID-19 pandemic has presented an opportunity to review current practice and open the way to developing a new approach which is patient-centred, safe, effective and efficient.

[Clinical and diagnostic value of including PCR blood test in the traditional algorithm for identifying causative agents of infective endocarditis: a cohort study of 124 patients].

BACKGROUND: If infective endocarditis (IE) is suspected, the determination of the etiology is of fundamental importance for the verification of the disease and the appointment of effective therapy. Microbiological diagnostic features are important, but they often need to be supplemented by culture-independent studies of pathological agents. AIM: To investigate of the diagnostic advantage and value of quantitative analysis of molecular biological methods (polymerase chain reaction - PCR, sequencing) in addition to microbiological examination of whole venous blood in IE. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We examined 124 patients with suspected or significant IE (DUKE 2015) hospitalized in the Vinogradov City Clinical Hospital (2015-2021). All patients underwent parallel microbiological (cultural) and molecular biological (PCR or PCR followed by sequencing) examination of venous whole blood samples. RESULTS: The introduction of an early parallel PCR study into the algorithm for the etiological diagnosis of IE made it possible to obtain an additional advantage in 43/124 (34.7%) patients, which made it possible to exclude unreliable results in the determination of CoNS skin commensals and pathogens atypical for IE or contamination and identify the true pathogens, and also for the first time to isolate the etiopathogenetic pathogen with a negative microbiological study. It was shown that in IE associated with CoNS, the association with the disease was confirmed by PCR in 21.4% (3/14) and refuted in 71.4% (10/14). The coincidence of the results of microbiological and PCR studies of blood samples was obtained only in 35/95 (36.8%). Positive results of PCR analysis of blood of biological material with negative results of culture were obtained in 22/51 (43.1%), of which 2/22 (9.0%) were able to confirm the presence of Bartonella spp DNA. The presented complex algorithm made it possible to significantly increase the possibility of intravital identification of the pathogen in the blood from 58.9 to 76.6%. IE with unknown etiology was present in 29/124 (23.4%) patients. A parallel PCR study allowed timely correction of antibiotic therapy in 43/124 (34.7%) patients. CONCLUSION: Expansion of indications for the use of PCR studies, primarily whole venous blood samples, is justified, not only in IE with negative results of microbiological examination, but also as a control method for the reliability of the results of traditional (cultural) diagnostic methods.

Choosing patients over placebos: oral transitional therapy vs. IV-only therapy for bacteraemia and infective endocarditis.

BACKGROUND: The belief that antibiotics must be administered intravenously (IV) to treat bacteraemia and endocarditis has its origins 70 years ago and has engrained itself in the psyche of the medical community and the public at large. This has led to hesitancy in adopting evidence-based strategies utilizing oral transitional therapy for the treatment of these infections. We aim to reframe the narrative around this debate, focusing on patient safety over vestigial psychology. OBJECTIVES: This narrative review summarizes the current state of the literature regarding the use of oral transitional therapy for the treatment of bacteraemia and infective endocarditis, focusing on studies comparing it to the traditional, IV-only approach. SOURCES: Relevant studies and abstracts from PubMed reviewed in April 2023. CONTENT: Treating bacteraemia with oral transitional therapy has been studied in 9 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), totalling 625 patients, as well as numerous large, retrospective cohorts, including 3 published in the last 5 years alone, totalling 4763 patients. We identified 3 large, retrospective cohort studies; one quasi-experimental, pre-post study, and 3 RCTs of patients with endocarditis, totalling 748 patients in the retrospective cohorts and 815 patients in prospective, controlled studies. In all these studies, no worse outcomes were observed in the oral transitional therapy arm as compared with IV-only therapy. The main difference has consistently been longer durations of inpatient hospitalization and increased risk of catheter-related adverse events like venous thrombosis and line-associated blood stream infections in the IV-only groups. IMPLICATIONS: There are ample data showing that choosing oral therapy reduces hospital stay and has fewer adverse events for patients than IV-only therapy, all with similar or better outcomes. In selected patients, choosing IV-only therapy may serve more as an anxiolytic "placebo" for the patient and provider rather than a necessity for treating the actual infection.

Intracardiac echocardiogram to diagnose infective endocarditis after transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve implantation.

A 70-year-old man with history of transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve implantation was admitted because of suspected infective endocarditis (IE). Transesophageal echocardiogram did not reveal any vegetations, as the metallic stent frames caused significant artifacts. Position emission tomography was also negative. Intracardiac echocardiogram (ICE) was performed retrogradely through the ascending aorta, which showed clear vegetations over the stent frame of the transcatheter heart valve. Endocarditis after transcatheter aortic valve implantation was not uncommon. With increasing use of valve-in-valve procedures, echocardiographic diagnosis of IE would be more challenging. This case demonstrated the advantage of ICE over conventional echocardiography in visualizing the neo-aortic valve complex for diagnosing IE.

Early Infective Endocarditis Associated with an Amplatzer Atrial Septal Occluder Device in a 14-Year-Old Male.

Infective endocarditis (IE) associated with an ASD device, particularly in the early post-procedure period, is extremely rare. We report a case of infective endocarditis presenting with embolic complications and vegetations on the device that were only seen on transesophageal echocardiography, necessitating device removal.